Interventional Glaucoma Challenging the current standard of care
IOP-lowering drops can lead to a flood of issues
Disease progression
- Over 6 years, 4.7% of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) went blind in at least 1 eye1,*
Impact on patient quality of life and adherence
- Chronic side effects, including hyperemia, periorbital fat atrophy, ocular surface disease (OSD), and hyperchromia2,3
- 74% of patients with glaucoma using drops for at least 6 months had OSD4
- Complex dosing regimens, instillation difficulties, inconvenience, and out-of-pocket costs5,6
- >90% of patients were nonadherent with their IOP-lowering drops7
- ~50% of patients stopped taking their IOP-lowering drops within 6 months7
- Chronic side effects, including hyperemia, periorbital fat atrophy, ocular surface disease (OSD), and hyperchromia2,3
Practice management challenges
- Administrative headaches, practice inefficiencies, pharmacy callbacks, patient callbacks, and wasted chair time
IOP=intraocular pressure; LTP=laser trabeculoplasty; VA=visual acuity.
Interventional glaucoma can help turn the tide
IG is a mindset9,10
- Proactive vs reactive
- Early procedural intervention
- Early predictive diagnostics
- Address adherence and risk
- Active monitoring
A critical component of IG is a long-duration procedural pharmaceutical—a unique technology that delivers continuous prostaglandin analog therapy.11
IG=interventional glaucoma.
24/7
patient adherence through sustained drug elution5
HELPS
REDUCE
the flood of issues caused by drops2,5-7
DISCOVER iDOSE TR
Ready to hear more?
Contact a representative to request more info.
References: 1. Williams AM, Liang HW, Lin HS. Lost to follow-up and risk of incident blindness among patients with glaucoma in the IRIS® Registry. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025:S2589-4196(25)00104-8. 2. Teymoorian S, Kaur J. Travoprost intracameral implant in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: early short-term real-world outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:157-166. 3. Detry-Morel M. Side effects of glaucoma medications. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2006;(299):27-40. 4. Chaneker SN, Usgaonkar UP, Akarkar SO. Ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients on topical medications and its relation to duration of treatment and number of medications. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research. 2022;10(2):55-58. 5. Berdahl JP, Sarkisian SR Jr, Ang RE, et al. Efficacy and safety of the travoprost intraocular implant in reducing topical IOP-lowering medication burden in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Drugs. 2024;84(1):83-97. 6. Economic burden worsens for glaucoma patients. Review of Optometry. Published March 24, 2021. Accessed August 7, 2025. https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/article/economic-burden-worsens-for-glaucoma-patients 7. Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffair E, Quigley HA, Walker AM. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):598-606. 8. Chang TC, Parrish RK, Fujino D, Kelly SP, Vanner EA. Factors associated with favorable laser trabeculoplasty response: IRIS registry analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;223:149-158. 9. Bacharach J, Blieden LS, Chaya C, et al. What does interventional glaucoma mean to you? Glaucoma Today. 2020:40-43. 10. Balas M, Mathew DJ. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: a review of the literature. Vision (Basel). 2023;7(3):54. 11. iDose TR (travoprost intracameral implant) 75 mcg Prescribing Information. Glaukos Corporation. 2023.